BereanMan,
The very premise of the Yale dialog was that we all worship the same "god." Every defender of Warren, Hybels, McLaren, Mouw, Anderson, etc., on this issue should go and simply read the Yale document. The very starting point for dialog - their premise - is that Allah and Jehovah are the same deity. Considering this, what spiritual dialog can we have? “What fellowship has light with darkness?” (II Cor 6:14-7:1)

Instead of asking what we have in common with false religions, Bible believers need to discern the things we can NEVER have in common. In this case, Islam worships a different god. The Muslim’s only hope is Jesus Christ. End of argument. Frankly, how dare those who claim to represent evangelicals try and gloss over the forever and unchangeable differences between Islam and authentic Christianity with politically correct double talk. When we fail to shine the light of truth on false religion the lost remain lost. This is exactly what has happened in this case.

God help us that we give clear signals to the world around us. Islam has assured the eternal destruction of every person who has ever embraced it. How surreal that at a time when more Muslims are coming to Christ in hostile environments around the world then ever before, American “evangelicals” are seeking PC driven dialog - instead of clearly enunciating which religion is true and which is false.

I find I am in mild agreement with both you and Eric (whom I know personally).  One thing I might caution you about.  When it comes to interpretation/translation principle, it is dangerous to look at the etymology of a particular word and derive from that a contemporary meaning.  The fact that the root of "Allah" bears a cognate relationship to the Hebrew "Elohim" in no fashion allows for arriving at a similarity in current usage.  The fact remains that the god contemporary Islam labels as Allah is not historically or theologically the same as Jehovah.  This is clear from history, and abundantly clear from even a cursory overview of how the Christian scriptures express Jehovah and how the Koran portrays Allah.  In neither religious system are the followers allowed to freely conceive of their God in whatever fashion they desire.  Both sets of holy writings paint a clear and undeniable picture of their supreme God, and while there are certainly similarities, the conflicting considerations regarding character and law are unmistakable.  I have not read the Yale document so I cannot speak to the statement that it somehow goes on record that Jehovah and Allah are the same.  It is, however, a fact that they are not.

There is NO such thing as a moderate Muslim. They all believe in the Mahdi, (our anti-Christ) and sharia jurisprudence which involves misogyny, murder, beheading, amputations etc.
Please don't call any practicing Muslim 'moderate'.

 I'm with you in all you say Pastor Charlotte Barrett..... thank you for the truth!!!  Its great to know the truth.

A one world government with mullahs, imams, the super rich and news media executives ruling. The rest of us will be second class citizens paying a higher tax.

Well said Pastor.

Bro, we are just sounding an alarm in our capacity as fellow watchmen. The Bible warns against a one-world religion and Allah and Christ are certainly not the same. The Chrislam business is an attempt to join Christianity with sth else, directly contrasting Christ in Jn 14:6. No ministry which is not based in the five solas should be considered as for the Kingdom of God. Only in Christ ALONE is our hope found. =)

YA GOT THAT RIGHT RANDY!!

The left have many lies, too.  The difference I see is that many of the left-wing lies are deception, incompleteness, etc.  The right-wing lies are falsifications, character attacks, etc.  I spent a lot of time after the 2008 elections receiving and correcting e-mails sent to me by well-meaning friends that were such obvious frauds (Photoshopped pictures, pictures reversed to show the Obamas saluting the flag with the wrong hand, etc) that I deduced that I can believe 2% of what the right says, and at least 5% of what the left says.  The Dems gave Bush a chance even after the disputed electoin in 2000; the Republicans after the 2008 electoin basically said "We will vote 'no' to everything Obama proposes -- even if we put forth the same view in the past -- just to kill his chances for reelection."  I give the Democrats an "F" for their performance, and the Republicans a "T" for conduct traiterous to democracy.  Not a pretty picture either way.

More insidious too.